[ad_1]
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Elon Musk’s aAI startup xAI is now in a legal battle with Apple and OpenAI, accusing them of planning to block competition in the artificial intelligence market. The case is filed in a Texas federal court claiming that Apple’s exclusive partnership with OpenAI prevents apps like Musk’s </span>Grok<span style="font-weight: 400;"> from getting visibility in the App Store despite strong user reviews. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">xAI is demanding billions of dollars in damages. Though OpenAI has denied all of Musk’s arguments but the fire seems not to be put off soon.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">ALSO READ: </span></p>
<h2><span style="color: #ba372a;"><strong>Why Musk Is Suing Apple & OpenAI</strong></span></h2>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Musk introduced xAI around two years back and has integrated the Grok chatbot into Tesla vehicles. OpenAI, CoPilot, and Chinese DeepSeek are its direct rivals that make this lawsuit crucial for its growth.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">According to the lawsuit, Apple’s decision to include ChatGPT directly into iPhones, iPads, and Macs gives OpenAI an unfair advantage that sidelines its rivals like Grok. Musk puts that even after “a million reviews with a 4.9-star average,” on Grok, Apple refuses to promote it, which is evidence of bias tied to its OpenAI partnership. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">OpenAI straightaway denies these claims, calling Musk’s lawsuit “a pattern of harassment,” while Apple has yet to comment.</span></p>
<h2><span style="color: #ba372a;"><strong>Is Musk’s Case Strong?</strong></span></h2>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Some legal experts, as quoted by Forbes, note that Apple’s dominance in the smartphone market could add weight to Musk’s claim, as courts might see ChatGPT integration in iPhones as creating a monopoly. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">However, Apple is likely to claim that its partnership with OpenAI was a business choice, not an anticompetitive move, and may cite security or operational reasons for embedding ChatGPT.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The case is said to be significant as it might shape how courts define the AI market in antitrust law.</span></p>
[ad_2]
